In times like these, maybe facts are not neutral Remember when the Downing Street Memo went from being ignored by the rightwingnuts to being routinely attacked by them as a forgery (without, of course, having any evidence other than their own repetitions to support that assertion)?
This note that has just appeared on the White House Iraq Group article in Wikipedia shows that we may finally be reaching the same tipping point again (I know it's probably a little schadenfreudistic of me, and certainly far from neutral, but I love watching wingnuts squirm):
The neutrality of this article is disputed.

  ¶ 10/17/2005 10:50:00 PM